Monday, August 27, 2012

The speech that Nixon never gave: ‘In event of moon disaster’

Neil Armstrong, who died on Saturday, is being remembered as the astronaut who took the the first step on the moon.
But the successful lunar landing on July 20, 1969, was not a given. A memo of a speech drafted by William Safire just days before the landing, is surfacing again on the Web. The memo is titled "In Event of Moon Disaster."
Back in 1999, William Safire discussed the undelivered speech with Tim Russert on NBC's "Meet The Press."
Safire was asked to consider an alternative to a successful moon landing.
Nixon's speech writer explained, "At that time, the most dangerous part of the moon mission, was getting the moon module back up into orbit and join the command ship."
Safire added, "But if they couldn't , they would have to be abandoned on the moon, left to die there. And mission control would have to close down communication. The men would either starve to death or commit suicide."
The moving text of the speech, sent to President Nixon's chief of staff, H.R. Halderman, was thankfully never used. It begins, "Fate has ordained that the men who went to the moon to explore in peace will stay on the moon to rest in peace.
These brave men, Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin, know that there is no hope for their recovery. But they also know that there is hope for mankind in their sacrifice."
The speech continues,
They will be mourned by their families and friends; they will be mourned by their nation; they will be mourned by the people of the world; they will be mourned by a Mother Earth that dared send two of her sons into the unknown.
In their exploration, they stirred the people of the world to feel as one; in their sacrifice, they bind more tightly the brotherhood of man.
In ancient days, men looked at stars and saw their heroes in the constellations. In modern times, we do much the same, but our heroes are epic men of flesh and blood.
Others will follow, and surely find their way home. Man's search will not be denied. But these men were the first, and they will remain the foremost in our hearts.
For every human being who looks up at the moon in the nights to come will know that there is some corner of another world that is forever mankind.
Retweet this story

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Senators banned Facebook Co-Founder Saverin from America: Don't come back. Ever.


Retweet this story

Senators ban Saverin from America: Don't come back. Ever.


Eduardo Saverin's decision to leave the United States with his money, but not his citizenship, has apparently touched a nerve in the Senate.
Sens. Chuck Schumer and Bob Casey held a press conference Thursday morning on Capitol Hill where they outlined legislation that would prevent the Facebook co-founder from ever returning to the United States.
Saverin, who now lives in Singapore, renounced his U.S. citizenship earlier this year. He will become astronomically wealthy on Friday when his former venture is listed on the NASDAQ. By renouncing his citizenship, Saverin is likely to avoid capital gains taxes on his Facebook shares.
Schumer called Saverin's decision "outrageous" and labeled his tactics a "scheme."
"Saverin has turned his back on the country that welcomed him and kept him safe, educated him, and helped him become a billionaire," Schumer said. "This is a great American success story gone horribly wrong."
Saverin and his representatives insist the Brazilian native did not renounce his citizenship for tax reasons.
In statement to CNN on Thursday, Saverin said it was "unfortunate" that his choice had led to a debate "based not on the facts, but entirely on speculation and misinformation."
"I am obligated to and will pay hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes to the United States government," Saverin said. "I have paid and will continue to pay any taxes due on everything I earned while a U.S. citizen."
Still, it seems likely that the move will help Saverin escape some of the hefty taxes he'd have to pay on his Facebook stake, though it's not known exactly how much of the company Saverin currently owns.
He owned 5% of the company's outstanding shares as recently as 2009, according to "The Facebook Effect," by David Kirkpatrick, but he has sold off some of those shares since then. He was not listed among those owning 5% or more of the company in Facebook's pre-IPO regulatory filings.
The Brazilian-born Facebook co-founder became a U.S. citizen in 1998 and has been living in Singapore since 2009, but the United States requires its citizens to pay income taxes no matter where they live. Saverin, who provided some of Facebook's initial financing, has not played an active role in the company for many years.
Schumer and Casey are calling their bill the "Ex-PATRIOT Act."
The proposal says that if a wealthy American seeks to renounce their citizenship, it will be presumed they have done so for tax purposes, unless the individual can convince the IRS otherwise.
If the person is unable to convince the IRS, they will be subject to 30% capital gains tax on future U.S. investments no matter where they live. Furthermore, they will not be allowed back into the United States. "Period," Schumer said. "They could not set foot in this country again." Retweet this story

Saturday, August 25, 2012

1st man to walk on the moon, dies at 82: Armstrong

This July 20, 1969 file photo provided by NASA shows Neil Armstrong. The family of Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, says he has died at age 82. A statement from the family says he died following complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures. It doesn't say where he died. Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969. He radioed back to Earth the historic news of "one giant leap for mankind." Armstrong and fellow astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin spent nearly three hours walking on the moon, collecting samples, conducting experiments and taking photographs. In all, 12 Americans walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972. (AP Photo/NASA)
Neil Armstrong was a soft-spoken engineer who became a global hero when as a steely-nerved pilot he made "one giant leap for mankind" with a small step onto the moon. The modest man, who had people on Earth entranced and awed from almost a quarter-million miles away, but credited others for the feat, died Saturday. He was 82.
Armstrong died following complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures, his family said in a statement. It didn't say where he died; he had lived in suburban Cincinnati.
Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969, capping the most daring of the 20th century's scientific expeditions. His first words after becoming the first person to set foot on the surface are etched in history books and the memories of those who heard them in a live broadcast.
"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," Armstrong said.
(Armstrong insisted later that he had said "a'' before man, but said he too couldn't hear it in the version that went to the world.)
In those first few moments on the moon, during the climax of a heated space race with the then-Soviet Union, Armstrong stopped in what he called "a tender moment" and left a patch to commemorate NASA astronauts and Soviet cosmonauts who had died in action.
"It was special and memorable but it was only instantaneous because there was work to do," Armstrong told an Australian television interviewer this year.
Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin spent nearly three hours walking on the lunar surface, collecting samples, conducting experiments and taking photographs.
"The sights were simply magnificent, beyond any visual experience that I had ever been exposed to," Armstrong once said.
The moonwalk marked America's victory in the Cold War space race that began Oct. 4, 1957, with the launch of the Soviet Union's Sputnik 1, a 184-pound satellite that sent shock waves around the world.
Although he had been a Navy fighter pilot, a test pilot for NASA's forerunner and an astronaut, Armstrong never allowed himself to be caught up in the celebrity and glamour of the space program.
"I am, and ever will be, a white socks, pocket protector, nerdy engineer," he said in February 2000 in one of his rare public appearances. "And I take a substantial amount of pride in the accomplishments of my profession."
A man who kept away from cameras, Armstrong went public in 2010 with his concerns about President Barack Obama's space policy that shifted attention away from a return to the moon and emphasized private companies developing spaceships. He testified before Congress and in an email to The Associated Press, Armstrong said he had "substantial reservations," and along with more than two dozen Apollo-era veterans, he signed a letter calling the plan a "misguided proposal that forces NASA out of human space operations for the foreseeable future."
NASA chief Charles Bolden recalled Armstrong's grace and humility in a statement Saturday.
"As long as there are history books, Neil Armstrong will be included in them, remembered for taking humankind's first small step on a world beyond our own," Bolden said.
Armstrong's modesty and self-effacing manner never faded.
When he appeared in Dayton in 2003 to help celebrate the 100th anniversary of powered flight, he bounded onto a stage before 10,000 people packed into a baseball stadium. But he spoke for only a few seconds, did not mention the moon, and quickly ducked out of the spotlight.
He later joined former astronaut and Sen. John Glenn to lay wreaths on the graves of Wilbur and Orville Wright. Glenn introduced Armstrong and noted it was 34 years to the day that Armstrong had walked on the moon.
"Thank you, John. Thirty-four years?" Armstrong quipped, as if he hadn't given it a thought.
At another joint appearance, the two embraced and Glenn commented: "To this day, he's the one person on Earth, I'm truly, truly envious of."
Armstrong's moonwalk capped a series of accomplishments that included piloting the X-15 rocket plane and making the first space docking during the Gemini 8 mission, which included a successful emergency splashdown.
In the years afterward, Armstrong retreated to the quiet of the classroom and his southwest Ohio farm. Aldrin said in his book "Men from Earth" that Armstrong was one of the quietest, most private men he had ever met.
In the Australian interview, Armstrong acknowledged that "now and then I miss the excitement about being in the cockpit of an airplane and doing new things."
At the time of the flight's 40th anniversary, Armstrong again was low-key, telling a gathering that the space race was "the ultimate peaceful competition: USA versus U.S.S.R. It did allow both sides to take the high road with the objectives of science and learning and exploration."
Glenn, who went through jungle training in Panama with Armstrong as part of the astronaut program, described him as "exceptionally brilliant" with technical matters but "rather retiring, doesn't like to be thrust into the limelight much."
Derek Elliott, curator of the Smithsonian Institution's U.S. Air and Space Museum from 1982 to 1992, said the moonwalk probably marked the high point of space exploration.
The manned lunar landing was a boon to the prestige of the United States, which had been locked in a space race with the former Soviet Union, and re-established U.S. pre-eminence in science and technology, Elliott said.
"The fact that we were able to see it and be a part of it means that we are in our own way witnesses to history," he said.
The 1969 landing met an audacious deadline that President Kennedy had set in May 1961, shortly after Alan Shepard became the first American in space with a 15-minute suborbital flight. (Soviet cosmonaut Yuri A. Gagarin had orbited the Earth and beaten the U.S. into space the previous month.)
"I believe this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before the decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to Earth," Kennedy had said. "No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important to the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish."
The end-of-decade goal was met with more than five months to spare. "Houston: Tranquility Base here," Armstrong radioed after the spacecraft settled onto the moon. "The Eagle has landed."
"Roger, Tranquility," Apollo astronaut Charles Duke radioed back from Mission Control. "We copy you on the ground. You've got a bunch of guys about to turn blue. We're breathing again. Thanks a lot."
The third astronaut on the mission, Michael Collins, circled the moon in the mother ship Columbia 60 miles overhead while Armstrong and Aldrin went to the moon's surface.
Collins told NASA on Saturday that he will miss Armstrong terribly, spokesman Bob Jacobs tweeted.
In all, 12 American astronauts walked on the moon between 1969 and the last moon mission in 1972.
For Americans, reaching the moon provided uplift and respite from the Vietnam War, from strife in the Middle East, from the startling news just a few days earlier that a young woman had drowned in a car driven off a wooden bridge on Chappaquiddick Island by Sen. Edward Kennedy. The landing occurred as organizers were gearing up for Woodstock, the legendary three-day rock festival on a farm in the Catskills of New York.
Armstrong was born Aug. 5, 1930, on a farm near Wapakoneta in western Ohio. He took his first airplane ride at age 6 and developed a fascination with aviation that prompted him to build model airplanes and conduct experiments in a homemade wind tunnel.
As a boy, he worked at a pharmacy and took flying lessons. He was licensed to fly at 16, before he got his driver's license.
Armstrong enrolled in Purdue University to study aeronautical engineering but was called to duty with the U.S. Navy in 1949 and flew 78 combat missions in Korea.
After the war, Armstrong finished his degree from Purdue and later earned a master's degree in aerospace engineering from the University of Southern California. He became a test pilot with what evolved into the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, flying more than 200 kinds of aircraft from gliders to jets.
Armstrong was accepted into NASA's second astronaut class in 1962 — the first, including Glenn, was chosen in 1959 — and commanded the Gemini 8 mission in 1966. After the first space docking, he brought the capsule back in an emergency landing in the Pacific Ocean when a wildly firing thruster kicked it out of orbit.
Armstrong was backup commander for the historic Apollo 8 mission at Christmastime in 1968. In that flight, Commander Frank Borman, and Jim Lovell and Bill Anders circled the moon 10 times, and paving the way for the lunar landing seven months later.
Aldrin said he and Armstrong were not prone to free exchanges of sentiment.
"But there was that moment on the moon, a brief moment, in which we sort of looked at each other and slapped each other on the shoulder ... and said, 'We made it. Good show,' or something like that," Aldrin said.
An estimated 600 million people — a fifth of the world's population — watched and listened to the landing, the largest audience for any single event in history.
Parents huddled with their children in front of the family television, mesmerized by what they were witnessing. Farmers abandoned their nightly milking duties, and motorists pulled off the highway and checked into motels just to see the moonwalk.
Television-less campers in California ran to their cars to catch the word on the radio. Boy Scouts at a camp in Michigan watched on a generator-powered television supplied by a parent.
Afterward, people walked out of their homes and gazed at the moon, in awe of what they had just seen. Others peeked through telescopes in hopes of spotting the astronauts.
In Wapakoneta, media and souvenir frenzy was swirling around the home of Armstrong's parents.
"You couldn't see the house for the news media," recalled John Zwez, former manager of the Neil Armstrong Air and Space Museum. "People were pulling grass out of their front yard."
Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins were given ticker tape parades in New York, Chicago and Los Angeles and later made a 22-nation world tour. A homecoming in Wapakoneta drew 50,000 people to the city of 9,000.
In 1970, Armstrong was appointed deputy associate administrator for aeronautics at NASA but left the following year to teach aerospace engineering at the University of Cincinnati.
He remained there until 1979 and during that time bought a 310-acre farm near Lebanon, where he raised cattle and corn. He stayed out of public view, accepting few requests for interviews or speeches.
"He didn't give interviews, but he wasn't a strange person or hard to talk to," said Ron Huston, a colleague at the University of Cincinnati. "He just didn't like being a novelty."
Those who knew him said he enjoyed golfing with friends, was active in the local YMCA and frequently ate lunch at the same restaurant in Lebanon.
In 2000, when he agreed to announce the top 20 engineering achievements of the 20th century as voted by the National Academy of Engineering, Armstrong said there was one disappointment relating to his moonwalk.
"I can honestly say — and it's a big surprise to me — that I have never had a dream about being on the moon," he said.
From 1982 to 1992, Armstrong was chairman of Charlottesville, Va.-based Computing Technologies for Aviation Inc., a company that supplies computer information management systems for business aircraft.
He then became chairman of AIL Systems Inc., an electronic systems company in Deer Park, N.Y.
Armstrong married Carol Knight in 1999, and the couple lived in Indian Hill, a Cincinnati suburb. He had two adult sons from a previous marriage.
It's the second death in a month of one of NASA's most visible, history-making astronauts. Sally Ride, the first American woman in space, died of pancreatic cancer on July 23 at age 61.
One of NASA's closest astronaut friends was fellow Ohioan, Mercury astronaut John Glenn, the first American to orbit the Earth.
Just prior to the 50th anniversary of Glenn's orbital flight this past February, Armstrong offered high praise to the elder astronaut and said that Glenn had told him many times how he wished he, too, had flown to the moon on Apollo 11. Glenn said it was his only regret.
Noted Armstrong in an email: "I am hoping I will be 'in his shoes' and have as much success in longevity as he has demonstrated." Glenn is 91.
At the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles on Saturday, visitors held a minute of silence for Armstrong. His family's statement made a simple request for anyone else who wanted to remember him:
"Honor his example of service, accomplishment and modesty, and the next time you walk outside on a clear night and see the moon smiling down at you, think of Neil Armstrong and give him a wink."
Retweet this story

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Who Will Be The First To Build Next Supersonic Passage Plane?

 The Lockheed Martin-led team's design for an aircraft that could fly at supersonic speed over land.
For more than three decades, Concorde represented the pinnacle of business travel -- the ultimate status symbol for the jetset executive.
Considered a marvel of aviation technology, the distinctive droop-nosed aircraft traveled at twice the speed of sound, flying from London to New York in about three and a half hours -- half the time of commercial airliners.
But even before an Air France Concorde crashed in 2000, killing all 100 passengers and nine crew members on board, the luster was beginning to wane.
Battling high operating costs and low passenger numbers, Air France and British Airways grounded their small, aging fleet a mere three years later.
But the dream of supersonic flight has not disappeared. Aviation manufacturers such as Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Aerion are working on supersonic technology -- with the latter predicting it could have a supersonic business jet in service as early as 2020.
Industry expert Joe Lissenden, the director of aerospace and defense consulting in the Americas for IHS Jane's, says it's likely that a next-generation supersonic commercial aircraft will emerge.
High demand from passengers, historic profitability on the routes and significant technological improvements have combined to make supersonic flight all the more viable, he said.

For Lissenden, the one challenge that remains is fuel cost. "Faster flights consume fuel faster which makes the flight more expensive," he said. "But this is a premium route, and premium prices will be charged."
Crucial to the efforts to restore supersonic aircraft to the skies is the work of national aerospace programs such as NASA and Japan's JAXA. Peter Coen is the supersonics research project manager for NASA's fundamental aeronautics program.
While the agency is not working on a specific supersonic aircraft, he said, "we are working on technologies we feel represent barriers to bringing back successful supersonic aircraft."
Those barriers include high atmosphere emissions, noise produced when taking off and landing, and the sonic boom -- the sound associated with the shockwaves created when objects travel faster than the speed of sound, which has prevented supersonic aircraft from flying overland routes.
Coen said his division was concentrated on addressing the sonic boom issue first, because "if you don't have overland supersonic flight, there's never going to be a market for the supersonic aircraft."
NASA has been collaborating with Boeing and Lockheed Martin on systems-level design studies, with each manufacturer producing models that have been subjected to wind tunnel testing to gauge their effectiveness.
Coen said phase one testing had successfully validated the basic design techniques. Reshaping the aircraft, the designs -- Boeing's two-jet configuration with engines mounted above the wing, and Lockheed Martin's tri-jet configuration, with two engines below the wing and a third mounted in the tail -- had been proven to significantly reduce the sonic boom to a "thump," dropping the noise from Concorde levels to close to what is considered the level of acceptability.
Coen said he expected to see a next-generation "son of Concorde" in the marketplace by around 2030, while a supersonic business jet "could happen sooner."
"The boom is the barrier and if we can get past that, I think we'll see people giving supersonic flight a lot more serious consideration," he said.
The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) also hopes to develop a supersonic passenger aircraft that is quiet, economical and environmentally friendly, and expects to achieved it some time this century.
Spokesman Masahisa Honda said that while the agency currently had no aircraft in specific development, along current projections it predicted a supersonic business jet to enter the market some time after 2015.

One of the frontrunners to do so is the Aerion SBJ, an 8-12 passenger business jet. "It will herald a return to supersonic civil flight without Concorde's environmental and economic drawbacks," said Aerion spokesman Adam Konowe.
He said development of a joint venture with aircraft manufacturers to produce the SBJ had been slowed by the recession, but once a deal was struck he anticipated a six-year development program to bring the aircraft to market. "We believe the SBJ will be certified, and enter service around the end of the decade -- 2020," he said.
But not everyone is convinced that a return to supersonic passenger flight is just around the corner. Chris Seymour, head of market analysis with aviation experts Ascend, was skeptical that there would be much progress before at least 2030.
"I think there's so many issues to be considered that I certainly can't see it happening in the next 20 years," he said.
Seymour believes that although technological barriers will likely be overcome, the key factor in whether it will become a reality is whether a market exists that is prepared to pay a premium for the ultimate status symbol in business travel -- particularly in an air-travel market that is focused on low prices.
"Will you have enough passengers willing to pay higher fares to fly more quickly?" He said. "If you look at Concorde, that wasn't the case. It came along at a time when the 747 also came in, which carried more people for lower fares. That's where the market was."
Peter Warth, director of Complete Aviation Solutions, also believes that a return to supersonic flight is further off than some are making out.
"There seems to be multiple technological and commercial obstacles that will need to be cleared," he said.
But he conceded: "I'm sure that when the original plans for Concorde, the A380 and the 787 Dreamliner were announced, the same questions about whether it could be achieved were asked. But they eventually delivered. I think time will tell."
Retweet this story

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Smartphone users exceed 30 million in S. Korea

Tech-savvy South Korea has more mobile phones than people
More than 60 percent of South Koreans now have smartphones despite their belated debut in the country, according to the latest industry figures.
Data from three mobile providers quoted by Yonhap news agency showed the number reached 30.03 million on Monday, out of a total of 52.55 million mobile phone users.
The tech-savvy nation has more mobile phones than people. The population hit 50 million in June.
South Koreans fell in love with smartphones relatively late compared to some other countries. Regulators approved Apple's iPhone only in September 2009 because of privacy concerns about some of its features.
Since then the use of smartphones has been growing at a brisk pace, with free wireless networks and cutting-edge gadgets widely available.
South Korea is one of the world's most wired societies, with 95 percent of homes using broadband Internet. It also has the world's top Internet download speeds, according to a study by Pando Networks. Retweet this story

Apple-Samsung To End Their Dispute

Apple and Samsung each laid claim to the spirit of Silicon Valley innovation as they delivered their closing arguments in their multibillion-dollar patent battle.
Apple is demanding total damages of up to $2.75bn from Samsung for what it alleges is wilful infringement of its design patents and so-called "trade dress" rights for the iPhone and iPad in the US.
Samsung, which countersued over Apple's alleged use of its wireless transmission patents and other underlying mobile-phone technology, is looking for $422m from its rival in compensation.
Two additional courtrooms were provided to accommodate the large number of reporters and observers who came to the San Jose courthouse for Tuesday's closing arguments, the biggest crowd yet seen in the case.
Addressing the nine jurors, Harold McElhinny of Morrison Foerster, Apple's lead counsel, compared a romantic portrayal of Apple's design process to what he characterised as Samsung's rapid "knock-off" of the iPhone.
"Everyone, even Samsung, thought that the iPhone changed the world," Mr McElhinny said. "Samsung was the iPhone's biggest fan ... They tried to compete with it and when they couldn't, they copied it."
In turn, outlining its closing argument, Samsung sought to portray Apple as a would-be monopolist that wanted to extract punitive damages for what its counsel suggested was a natural evolution of technology.
Mr McElhinny suggested that "every smartphone does not have to look like an iPhone", showing pictures of other devices including Nokia's Lumia and a Casio phone.
Mr McElhinny alleged that Samsung had "disrespected" the legal process by refusing to bring its most senior executives over from South Korea, a position he contrasted with appearances from Apple's Scott Forstall and Phil Schiller, its software and marketing chiefs respectively. "They were willing to face cross examination," he said. "No Samsung executive was prepared to come here from Korea and answer questions under oath. Instead of witnesses, they sent you lawyers."
Mr McElhinny's summing up focused on Samsung internal documents that referenced the Korean firm's "crisis of design" in the face of the iPhone. He pointed to warnings from Google that Samsung should not copy Apple's device too closely, which he alleged Samsung ignored in a three-month design process.
"In those critical three months, Samsung was able to copy and incorporate the results of Apple's four-year investment in hard work and ingenuity without taking any of the risks, because they were copying the world's most successful product," he said.
The subsequent boost to Samsung's smartphone sales prompted "a whole series of iPhone knock-offs," Mr McElhinny alleged.
"If you render judgment for Apple in this case, you will have reaffirmed the American patent system," Mr McElhinny concluded. "People in this valley will continue to invest -- they will hire people -- because they know those investments will be protected."
For Samsung, referencing the huge press attention on the case, Charles Verhoeven, a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, told the jury: "Your decision ... could change the way competition works in this country ... Is this country going to have vigorous competition between competitors? Or giant competitors armed with patent arsenals that block competition?"
Despite representing a Korean firm against a local Californian company, Mr Verhoeven played on the innovation that the area around San Jose is famous for.
"Competition is what has changed this country. We can see it ourselves in Silicon Valley," he said. "The real reason Apple's bringing this case is that rather than competing in the marketplace, Apple is seeking a competitive edge through the courtroom ... Apple says it's entitled to have a monopoly on a rectangle with rounded corners on a large screen."
Mr Verhoeven also pointed to what he said were examples of "prior art" that invalidated Apple's design patents.
The closing arguments came after a four-week hearing that has tested the technical understanding of the nine-person jury and the patience of Judge Lucy Koh, who has frequently clashed with Apple and Samsung's counsel as they squabbled daily over the evidence, procedure and presentation of the case.
Last Thursday, Judge Koh, herself a former patent attorney, said that Apple's lawyer must be "smoking crack" if he expected to call a large number of witnesses in the two hours of court time remaining. Last-ditch attempts by the judge to encourage a settlement between the two companies did not succeed despite Samsung and Apple chief executives again discussing the case in recent days.
But Judge Koh has also tried to be sympathetic to the jury as it grapples with a complex set of legal and technological issues.
"I need everybody to stay conscious ... including me," she said before beginning to read out 84 instructions to the jury for how they should decide the case and calculate any award of damages. People in the courtroom were encouraged to stand up occasionally "to make sure the blood's still flowing".
Jurors must wade through a 20-page verdict form designed to guide them through their decision, which must be unanimous. A verdict could take several days.
Retweet this story

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

6 under $500 laptops you can buy at yahoo shop online

While many high-school and college students now tote around smaller gadgets like smartphones, e-readers and tablets, a laptop computer still makes the grade for its physical keyboard, big screen and ample storage.
But here's something you won't hear from the sales clerk at your local big box store: You don't need a top-of-the-line computer to get schoolwork done.
Oh sure, those who take video editing, animation or video game design might need the extra horsepower, but the majority of the tasks a student needs a computer for — web browsing, messaging, word processing and social networking — can be handled by virtually any Internet-connected machine.
If you're shopping around for a new laptop to start the year off right, consider one of these following half-dozen picks for budget-conscious students (not listed in any particular order).

For Chatty Cathys
Sony's 15.5" VAIO E Series laptop (model # SVE1511RFXB; $399.99) has a number of features you'd expect in a notebook — a second-generation Intel Core i3-2370M processor, 4GB of system memory (RAM) and 500GB hard drive — but it's also an ideal PC for video calling. Built into the machine is an HD webcam with an Exmor sensor and face tracking, to make it easy (and clear) to video chat with family and friends. And while the camera has a microphone, integrated Bluetooth means you can also wear a headset for even clearer audio. This Windows 7 Home Premium laptop also includes a DVD burner, HDMI out (to connect to a HDTV), an Intel HD Graphics 3000 chip and exclusive software including Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum, ACID Music Studio, Sound Forge Audio Studio and more.

Math blaster
Students studying math, accounting, statistics or business might appreciate a laptop with a dedicated numeric keypad along the right-hand side of the keyboard — just like most desktop computers. That's what you'll find in Toshiba's satin black 15.6-inch Satellite laptop (model # C855; $399.99), a 1.3-inch thin Windows PC. You'll also find a handful of connectivity and media options along the sides and back of the laptop, including one USB 3.0 and 2 USB 2.0 ports, a multi-format media card reader, HDMI out, DVD burner and Ethernet port (for wired Internet connection). Under the hood of this entry-level PC is a second-gen Intel Core i3-2370M processor, 4GB of memory and 500GB hard drive.

Personalize that PC
If you've got a bit more cash to spend, the newest Dell Inspiron 15R ($499.99) delivers a lot of bang for the buck. Along with its second-generation Intel Core i3 processor (3M Cache, 2.4 GHz), you get 6GB of system memory, 500GB hard drive, 8x dual-layer DVD burner and a Chiclet ("island")-style keyboard with multi-touch trackpad. But students might also like the option to change up the look of this Windows 7 Home Premium PC with interchangeable SWITCH lids: while the laptop comes standard in silver, you can personalize it with additional lids for $30 apiece (e.g. red, blue or pink). Other highlights include a 15.6-inch 720p LED display and Bluetooth, but only two USB 2.0 ports.

Bigger is better
Especially if it's going to be used primarily as a desktop replacement, a larger screen laptop is the way to go. For $449 you can pick up a 17.3-inch HP Pavilion laptop (model # G7-1340DX), with a good-looking LED-backlit high-definition widescreen display (1600 x 900 resolution) ideal for movies, games and photos. Toss this puppy in your dorm room to handle all your work and entertainment needs, but at more than 6 pounds you might opt to bring your tablet or smartphone to the lecture hall for note-taking instead. Similar to the other laptops in this sub-$500 round-up, this computer houses a second-gen Intel Core i3 processor, 4GB of memory, 500GB hard drive, DVD burner, webcam and multiple connectivity ports (USB, card reader, and more).

Pretty in pink
If you're looking for something affordable to tote around campus — and prefer something a little more "you" than the typical black or silver laptop — the matte pink Asus X401A-RPK4 laptop ($329.99) delivers a unique look at a low price. This 4-pound 14-inch laptop features an Intel Pentium processor (B970), 4GB of memory and a 320GB hard drive — but there's no optical (CD/DVD) drive included. Other features of this entry-level laptop include an HDMI output jack to connect to a HDTV, projector or monitor; 0.3-megpaixel webcam, multi-format media reader and two USB ports. Hey, for under $330 this isn't such a bad pick for basic tasks, and for those who feel prettier in pink.

Lift a finger
Now the no. 2 computer maker in the world (behind HP), Lenovo has a number of models ranging from inexpensive netbooks to premium ultrabooks, and everything in between. One of the company's sub-$500 laptops has a couple of interesting features, including a fingerprint reader so you (and only you) can log onto the PC. The 15.6-inch, 5.3-pound Lenovo IdeaPad V570 ($479.99) has a second-gen Intel Core i5-2450M processor (supporting Turbo Boost technology), 6GB of memory, 500GB hard drive and multi-format DVD burner. Along with Wi-Fi — something all laptops in this round-up has — this Lenovo model is also WiDi-enabled, therefore it could wirelessly push content to a nearby television (via NetGear Push2TV box, not included). Other features include HDMI output, 2.0-megapixel webcam, 6-in-1 media reader and three USB 2.0 ports. Retweet this story

Monday, August 20, 2012

Apple's iPhone Is Now Worth More Than All Of Microsoft


This is an entirely stunning statistic: Apple‘s iPhone sales are now worth more than all of Microsoft:
One Apple product, something that didn’t exist five years ago, has higher sales than everything Microsoft has to offer. More than Windows, Office, Xbox, Bing, Windows Phone, and every other product that Microsoft has created since 1975. In the quarter ended March 31, 2012, iPhone had sales of $22.7 billion; Microsoft Corporation, $17.4 billion.
Now when we say “worth” there’s a number of different things that we can mean. One way would be to try and measure the stock market value of the iPhone against all of Microsoft for example. But this isn’t something easily done: sure, we could make attempts at it but we’d not get very close to a decent result. Too much of the value that we ascribe to Apple is of the entire ecosystem, including the company’s reputation for style, for us to really be able to pull out separate market valuations for a specific product.
We might also try looking at profits: we know what those are for Microsoft but pulling them out for the iPhone alone would be difficult. Partly the problem above, we’re absolutely certain that the iPhone makes more profits as an Apple product than it would if exactly the same item were being sold by anyone else. Partly also how it influences the whole Apple ecosystem: what portion of iTunes profits should be ascribed to the iPhone, what to the iPad, what to entirely other systems?
While it’s not really correct, for “worth” implies a stock value not a flow value, and sales is a flow not a stock, the easiest of the available numbers to use is just that: compare the sales. And as Vanity Fair notes, the value of sales of iPhones is now greater than the value of the entirety of Microsoft’s sales.
And the thing is, that’s not really the most remarkable thing about Apple’s recent achievements. The truly strange thing is that they’ve managed to gain this level of sales while making software style margins on selling hardware. That’s the trick that no one else is managing at all. Retweet this story

Thursday, August 16, 2012

The New Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 tablet

Reviewer says that the stylus pen on the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 tablet is its key defining feature
When Samsung's Galaxy Note smartphone went on sale in the U.S. in February, two things made it, um, noteworthy. At 5.3″, its display was the largest one ever offered on a phone. And the Note came with Samsung's S Pen, a precision stylus which let you jot notes and sketch pictures without jabbing at the screen with your finger.
Let's face it, though -- that humongous screen completely overshadowed the S Pen. Everyone had a strong opinion about it. Many people found the notion of a phone with a screen that edges in on tablet territory alluring: Samsung says it's shipped ten million Galaxy Notes to date. Others, however, considered that same notion to be comical rather than practical. (Held to the ear, the jumbo-sized Note tends to throw off proportions and make it look like your skull has shrunk by a size or two.)
Now Samsung is releasing its second Galaxy Note device, the Galaxy Note 10.1, which goes on sale in the U.S. Thursday. This Note, unlike its smartphone sibling, shouldn't be an object of controversy.

There's nothing startling about its form factor: It's an Android tablet with a 10.1″ display, a size that's comfortably familiar in the Android world, and not radically dissimilar from the 9.7-incher on Apple's iPad. But it's a solid, straightforward Android tablet that comes with an S Pen, a suite of pen-friendly apps and some productivity-oriented software enhancements which give it a more businesslike flavor than Samsung's
The Galaxy Note 10.1 with 16GB of storage lists for $499, the same price as a 16GB iPad. But the 32GB Galaxy Note is $549, $50 less than a 32GB iPad. And while there's no 64GB model, the tablet's microSD slot lets you add a 32GB memory card for $20 or less, bringing capacity up to 64GB for a grand total of about $570 -- a steep discount off the 64GB iPad's $699 sticker price. Both the 16GB and 32GB variants offer wi-fi but no cellular option and come with 50GB of Dropbox online storage for two years.
If the Note 10.1 sells well, it won't be on the strength of the bang it delivers for your buck. It'll be because it's one of the relatively few Android tablets with a snappy answer to the bottom-line question "Why should somebody buy this instead of an iPad?"
The iPad doesn't come with a pen and may never do so, given Steve Jobs' famous declaration that "if you see a stylus, they blew it." Scads of companies have stepped in to fill the gap -- my favorite iPad stylus is Adonit's Jot Flip -- but all of their designs suffer from the fact that they're designed to work with a tablet that was engineered for fingertips.
Samsung, however, built the Galaxy Note 10.1 from the ground up for pen use. And when it decided to add pens to some of its devices, it made the eminently sensible decision to work with Wacom, the company which dominates the market for graphics tablets used by artists.
The S Pen, which stows in a slot on tablet's side when not in use, is based on Wacom's technology. That means that it's pressure-sensitive and extremely precise, and doesn't use a battery. Using it feels like writing with a slightly stubby ballpoint; Samsung also sells a larger pen, as well as one with an "eraser" on the opposite end from the nib.
Android doesn't come with any apps meant expressly for pen use. So Samsung created some of its own, including S Note, a highly capable note-taking program which lets you write and draw on simulated lined pages, graph paper and blank sheets. You can use a fine-line pen, a pencil, a paintbrush or a highlighter; pressure sensitivity lets you vary your pen strokes or lay down a thicker coat of paint by pressing harder.
S Note can also convert your block-letter or cursive input into editable text. It did a surprisingly accurate job of deciphering my chicken scratchings. But as with every other device I've ever used with handwriting recognition, the payoff didn't seem worth the effort required: You need to write words a few at a time, then pause while the tablet interprets them. Except for brief notes, if you want to see your words in a crisp, legible typeface rather than your own handwriting, you're probably best off using the on-screen keyboard. (Samsung sells a case, obviously inspired by the iPad's Smart Cover, which lets you angle the tablet for comfy typing.)
Unlike the iPad, the Galaxy Note 10.1 is designed to let you rest your palm on the screen as you write or draw without getting confused by the fact that two parts of your hand are in contact with the display at once. Despite this, I found myself occasionally triggering actions unintentionally as I worked.
I suspect that the fact I'm a southpaw doesn't help: When I begin to write on the left-hand side of the screen, my palm rests on top of Android's on-screen buttons for tasks such as going back one screen and returning to the home screen. A righty's palm would fall in a less critical spot.
The S Pen works in other apps besides S Note, of course. I liked using it to crop photos and perform touch-up work in Photoshop Touch, which Samsung throws in for free. The tablet includes a program that points you towards pen-friendly programs in Google's Play store; most of the ones I tried didn't support pressure sensitivity, but the S Pen is still a plus in any program that involves handwritten note-taking, sketching or any gesture that's tough to perform accurately with a fingertip.
Pen aside, this is one of the best big-screen Android tablets I've tried, a nicely-styled 1.3-pound package that's a skosh lighter than an iPad and doesn't look too much like an iPad clone. (Samsung, presumably, would like to minimize the future time it spends squabbling with Apple in court.)
Retweet this story

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

HTML 5 is not a safe plateform?

An increasingly popular web language will be the next big target for cybercriminals, according to a security firm.
HTML 5 is being developed to improve the look of websites, remove the need for plug-ins such as Java and Flash, and bring the storage capacity of the cloud to the browser.
It is still in development but some applications already support it.
Because it is new, it is attractive to cybercriminals, said Sophos.
Super cookies "This is potentially going to be quite painful," said James Lyne, director of technology strategy at the security firm.
"It is more than a web language. Much more data can be stored in the browser which means that criminals can now attack the browser to steal data."
Traditionally browsers have stored relatively small amounts of "sticky" data, limited mainly to cookies which track the websites that people have visited.
The fact that HTML 5 allows more data to be stored in the browser means firms and cybercriminals could create super-cookies to track people's web behaviour.
Some malware techniques have faded out of fashion because patches have been found for them.
HTML 5 makes some ripe for renewed exploitation, thinks Mr Lyne.
Chief among them is clickjacking, a relatively simple malware technique used to persuades users to click on a link often via a pop-up box.
With previous web standards, developers could create code which questioned where click instructions came from in order to prevent clickjacking.
Tracking people HTML 5 hides a lot of this detail from software writers making it harder to distinguish between good and bad sites.
"By building this wall it is hampering developers' ability to write secure code," said Mr Lyne.
The other major security flaw for HTML 5, identified by Sophos, is the fact that it is built to integrate with mobile features such as GPS.
It means that a mobile phone browser will be able to identify a person's location, as long as it is given permission, straight out of the box.
But, said Mr Lyne, the permissions for who had access to this were currently "poorly defined".
"Some sites, such as Google Maps, you might be happy to know where you are while others you wouldn't want to know your location."
Adobe Flash HTML 5 is already being widely adopted, particularly in the mobile world.
Software developer Adobe Systems recently announced it was ending development of its Flash Player plug-in for mobile devices.
Flash has traditionally been used to run movies, games and other applications but Adobe said it now believes that HTML 5 technology offered the "best solution" because it was "universally supported".
Google is also a fan, and uses it in its Gmail service to allow users to drag and drop files into messages. This functionality is currently only supported by the latest Chrome and Firefox browsers.
While the web standard brings new security issues, it will also solve others, thinks Mr Lyne.
"It eliminates the need for Flash and other external products that have been littered with vulnerabilities," he said.
Efforts must now be made to finish the design as soon as possible, he added.
"It is critical to get a full spec for HTML 5 and there needs to be a serious focus on making sure the browser is secure."
HTML 5 is being developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3).
QR pornography
Sophos said other targets for cybercriminals in 2012 would include the use of near-field communication (NFC), which allowed users to wave a mobile phone at a NFC-enabled reader in order to make small purchases.
"The mobile phone becomes a digital credit card which makes it really worth hacking," said Mr Lyne.
Some of the threats for the coming year are lower-tech - such as malware stickers placed over the QR codes used by firms to allow smartphone owners access to content.
QR codes typically appear on posters. Once scanned with a mobile phone and opened with a QR reader, app users can get access to a range of content.
Train stations, for example, use QR codes to allow passengers to download timetables.
But cybercriminals are exploiting their popularity by placing their own stickers on top of the QR codes to take people to more nefarious sites.
"I used one on a train station and it took me to a Russian porn site," said Mr Lyne.
Crime packs 2011 has been a bumper year for malware. Sophos said it received an average of 150,000 pieces of malicious code each day - a 60% increase on this time last year according to the firm.
Global cybersecurity spending is on track to exceed $60bn (£38bn) according to a study by consultancy firm PricewaterhouseCoopers.
The greater use of mobile devices and cloud computing were fuelling the growth, it said.
Increasingly security companies are working with the police to crack some of the most notorious cybergangs.
Sophos, for example, feeds bundles of malware generated by the same criminal gangs to the security services.
It has, according to Mr Lyne, never been easier for cybercriminals to set up in business, with crime packs offering a library of malware, readily available online.
"I found 27 such packs within an hour of searching on the public internet," he said.
Such crime packs also offer tips on how to avoid anti-virus software, as well as a dashboard to allow cyber criminals to see how well their malware is performing.
"We have moved from a situation where we were playing a game of draughts with a slightly drunk opponent to a skilled chess player who knows all the tricks we know," said Mr Lyne.
Retweet this story

Neo Geo Game makes come back


Releasing December 6, the Neo Geo X Gold Entertainment System is a handheld that plays classic Neo Geo arcade games. In addition to the handheld itself (which boasts a 4.3-inch LCD screen),  it comes packaged with a standard-sized joystick controller, a dock that connects the handheld to your TV, and 20 pre-loaded Neo Geo games.
And it can be yours for only $200. Wait, really? Doesn't that seem a little steep for a system that only plays games that are roughly two decades old? Maybe when you compare it to a new Nintendo 3DS (retail price: $170), but not when you compare it to the original Neo Geo home console.
Modeled after the successful Neo Geo coin-op cabinets, the home version essentially reproduced the arcade game experience in your living room. That was quite a cool trick at the time, made even cooler by the Neo Geo's wealth of top-flight 2D fighting game franchises like Fatal Fury, Samurai Shodown, and The King of Fighters.
But while the Neo Geo home console boasted burlier graphics than what you might find on competing systems like the Super Nintendo and Sega Genesis, it boasted a burlier price tag, too: a stomach-churning $650 at launch. In 1991. I'm no good at math, but I believe that's the equivalent of, like, $25,000 today.
The result? No one could afford it. Gamers flocked to the SNES and Genesis, and by the time Neo Geo prices started dropping, it was too late. By 1995, Sony and Sega were releasing new consoles capable of churning out cutting-edge 3D graphics, dooming the Neo Geo to niche gaming history.
At any rate, the Neo Geo Gold X is a legit release (it's being made by Tommo in conjunction with SNK Playmore, the original Neo Geo creators) and packs a pretty nice assortment of games:
3 Count Bout
Art of Fighting II
Alpha Mission II
Baseball Stars II
Cyber Lips
Fatal Fury
Fatal Fury Special
The King of Fighters '95
King of the Monsters
Last Resort
League Bowling
Magician Lord
Metal Slug
Mutation Nation
Nam 1975
Puzzled
Real Bout - Fatal Fury Special
Samurai Shodown II
Super Sidekicks
World Heroes Perfect
Some great stuff in there, though it's likely only going to appeal to those of us who couldn't afford the original system 21 years ago. Which, I guess, is just about everyone. Welcome back, Neo Geo! Retweet this story

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

How to Uninstall the Vuze Toolbar

 

instructions

 


  1. Internet Explorer

    • 1
      Click the "Start" button and then "Control Panel."
    • 2
      Click "Programs and Features" or "Uninstall a Program" depending on your Control Panel view. This launches the programs window.
    • 3
      Scroll down, click the "Vuze Toolbar." Click the "Uninstall" button. When prompted, confirm your selection to remove the browser add-on.
    • 4
      Close and restart Internet Explorer.

    Firefox

    • 5
      Click the "Tools" menu in your browser and click "Add-ons." A new dialog box launches.
    • 6
      Select the "Extensions" tab. Scroll down and select the "Vuze Toolbar."
    • 7
      Click the "Uninstall" button to remove the browser add-on. Restart Firefox.

    Safari

    • 8
      Click "Finder" on the dock to launch a new Finder window.
    • 9
      Click "Applications" in the left pane. Scroll down to "Toolbars" and click "Vuze."
    • 10
      Double-click "Uninstall." Fill in your user name and password. Click "OK" to uninstall the toolbar.
    • 11
      Close and relaunch Safari.

    Google Chrome

    • 12
      Right-click the extensions bar in your browser and click "Uninstall."
    • 13
      Click "Uninstall" again in the confirmation dialog box to remove the toolbar.
    • 14
      Close and restart Google Chrome.

Retweet this story

Monday, August 13, 2012

Military test hypersonic jet that could fly across the U.S. in less than 1 hour

X-51A Waverider
Superfast jet that could fly from L.A. to New York City in less than an hour may be one step closer to reality after a key test this week.
The  X-51A WaveRider, an unmanned aircraft that could reach speeds up to Mach 6 will be launched from the wing of a B-52 bomber high above the Pacific Ocean on Tuesday, the Los Angeles Times reports.
The WaveRider is expected to zip up into the atmosphere and fly at hypersonic speeds—3,600 mph—for 300 seconds, before breaking up into the ocean.
If successful, if would be the longest jaunt for the test aircraft. The newspaper noted that the development of WaveRider could lead to progress on a passenger jet that could theoretically travel across the U.S. in 46 minutes.
"Attaining sustained hypersonic flight is like going from propeller-driven aircraft to jet aircraft," Robert A. Mercier, deputy for technology in the high speed systems division at the Air Force Research Laboratory in Ohio told the L.A. Times.
But beyond passenger flights, achieving hypersonic speeds could also lead to the development of the next generation of missiles, space vehicles and military aircraft, the Times points out.
The WaveRider program had an issue in June of 2011 when the test vehicle in a similar test to the one planned for Tuesday failed to reach full power.
The Pentagon said it spent about $2 billion on technology and engineering around hypersonic flight over the last decade, the Times reports. This program is estimated to cost $140 million, according to Globalsecurity.org, a military policy research website.
If you're keeping score, the Concorde, a supersonic airliner, crossed the Atlantic at 1,350 mph.
It would take about 3.5 hours, about twice as fast as current commercial airlines. The Concorde was retired in 2003.
Retweet this story

Gadget: Israel tests SMS missile alerts

Israeli soldiers watch as a missile is launched from the Iron Dome defence system in March
Israel on Sunday began testing an SMS system for warning the public of an imminent missile attack as chatter over a possible strike on Iran dominated the Israeli press headlines.
As testing began, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had chalked up "a significant improvement" in its home front defence capabilities, mentioning its highly-vaunted anti-missile systems such as Iron Dome and Arrow 2.
"There has been a significant improvement in our level of defence capacity on the home front: with Iron Dome, with the Arrow, in terms of protection and shelters, in advanced warning systems and in other areas," he said at the start of the weekly cabinet meeting.
"But all the threats which are directed towards the Israeli home front are dwarved by another threat -- different in both its scope and its essence. And so I repeat: Iran must never be allowed to get nuclear weapons."
With front page stories in two papers suggesting Tehran had made progress towards the manufacture and assembly of a nuclear warhead, Israel's Home Front Command began final tests of the SMS warning system which is expected to be operational by September.
"The Home Front Command will today start conducting nationwide testing of the 'Personal Message' alert system, which will end on Thursday," said a statement indicating that SMS texts in Hebrew, Arabic, English and Russian would be sent to subscribers on Israel's three main networks: Cellcom, Pelephone and Orange.
The idea is that the SMS system could be used to warn the population of an imminent missile attack by Iran or Lebanon's Hezbollah militia if Israel strikes Tehran's nuclear facilities which it believes is a front for developing a bomb.
In recent days, talk of a possible strike on Iran has dominated the headlines, largely coming from unsourced officials quoting intelligence reports, none of which it was possible to verify.
"Iran has made progress toward nuclear warhead," was the headline in the Haaretz newspaper.
"The Iranians greatest progress recently is in the manufacture and assembly of a nuclear warhead," the paper said, quoting the official who was drawing his information from an intelligence report which an Israeli newspaper said was recently presented to US President Barack Obama.
Although US officials declined to comment on the report, Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak referred to it directly last week, saying it "brings the American assessment much much closer to ours" and makes the Iranian issue "a bit more urgent."
"Not prepared for war" was the headline in Yediot Aharonot, which questioned Israel's readiness to both mount a decisive military strike and to cope back home with the expected fallout.
"Will those preparations be enough to deal a crushing blow to Iran's nuclear facilities and allow Israel to cope with the repercussions of such an attack?" it said. "It is not at all clear that that is the case."
It quoted statistics saying 700,000 civilians did not have bomb shelters, only half of Israel's population of 7.8 million people had gas masks, and that work to fortify 70 percent of the country's hospitals would not be completed until 2015.
Although Israel charges that its arch foe Iran is driving for a nuclear bomb, the US intelligence services say only that they suspect it is seeking a weapons capability but that no decision has been taken on actually making one.
Israel is widely suspected to have the region's sole, if undeclared, nuclear arsenal.

© 2012 AFP
Retweet this story

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Thought words

Greatness lies not in being strong, but in the right using of strength.
— Henry Ward Beecher Retweet this story

Friday, August 10, 2012

What Google Employees Gets When They Die


It’s no surprise that the employee benefits of Google are among the best in the land—free haircuts, gourmet food, on-site doctors and high-tech “cleansing” toilets are among the most talked-about—but in a rare interview with Chief People Officer Laszlo Bock I discovered that the latest perk for Googlers extends into the afterlife.
“This might sound ridiculous,” Bock told me recently in a conversation on the ever-evolving benefits at Google, “But we’ve announced death benefits at Google.”  We were scheduled for a talk on Google’s widening age-gap (the oldest Googler is currently 83); I wanted to know how child- and healthcare benefits have evolved as the company has scaled.
Instead, Bock, who joined the company in 2006 after a stint with General Electric, blew me away by disclosing a never-before-made-public-perk:  Should a U.S. Googler pass away while under the employ of the 14-year old search giant, their surviving spouse or domestic partner will receive a check for 50% of their salary every year for the next decade. Even more surprising, a Google spokesperson confirms that there’s “no tenure requirement” for this benefit, meaning most of their 34 thousand Google employees qualify.
“One of the things we realized recently was that one of the harshest but most reliable facts of life is that at some point most of us will be confronted with the death of our partners,” Bock says. “And it’s a horrible, difficult time no matter what, and every time we went through this as a company we tried to find ways to help the surviving spouse of the Googler who’d passed away.” The case-by-case do-goodery was formally implemented in 2011. In addition to the 10-year pay package, surviving spouses will see all stocks vested immediately and any children will receive a $1,000 monthly payment from the company until they reach the age of 19 (or 23 if the child is a full-time student).
What makes the death benefit notable isn’t just its generosity—Google is, of course, far from cash-strapped—but rather that, unlike most employee perks on Google campuses that aim to increase happiness, creativity and productivity, providing death benefits is a no-win for the company. “Obviously there’s no benefit to Google,” Bock concedes. “But it’s important to the company to help our families through this horrific if inevitable life event.”
Google has been anticipating the major life events of their employees since day one. According to Bock, Sergey Brin got the ball rolling when the company had fewer than 100 employees, suggesting that the company could provide a nanny to each working mom or dad on staff. (“Obviously that’s an idea that’s been toned down,” Bock jokes). The company does have on-site child care but has raised its monthly fees significantly in recent years.
In maternity and paternity leave, however, Google benefits are at the head of the pack: according to a company spokesperson, new dads enjoy six weeks of paid leave while moms can take 18 weeks after the birth of a child. (Even better for the cash-strapped new parents: stocks will continue to vest on your leave).
But the link between maternity benefits and retaining employees is clear. According to a 2008 report by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, more than 60 percent of men and women in the work force have kids under the age of 6, so anticipating their needs can mean keeping new parents on-board and, most importantly, engaged.
“When we think about [employee] needs at Google, we think less about how old you are that we do about your particular cluster of needs,” Bock says. “For someone who fits a certain profile—say, an aging parent to take care of, or kids or grandkids to support–whatever your cluster of needs are, we do our best to discern the best package of perks and programs to meet them.”
Google People experts use three methods to tap into the needs of employees: an annual survey called “Googlegeist” that measures the temperature of employees in every department and analyzes data to identify emerging trends, employee resource groups (read: clubs) where like-minded employees share ideas that are funneled up to HR (Bock says the most active are the “Grayglers,” the self-titled club for over-the-hill Googlers), and email aliases that run the gamut from financial advice to childcare options to cafĂ© feedback.
Google gets a lot of press for its perks, Bock says, but he’s loathe to even use that word. “People say ‘you’re Google, of course you can offer these crazy things,’” but from where Bock sits, it’s not even about the money. “There is, of course, research that show employee benefit programs like ours can improve retention, and appear to improve performance on some level,” he says.
“But it turns out that the reason we’re doing these things for employees is not because it’s important to the business, but simply because it’s the right thing to do. When it comes down to it, it’s better to work for a company who cares about you than a company who doesn’t. And from a company standpoint, that makes it better to care than not to care.” Retweet this story